A SCIENTIFIC APPROACH to TEACHING ABOUT EVOLUTION & SPECIAL CREATION
Anton E. Lawson in ABT Journal: April 1999
| SYNOPSIS | A very interesting activity which looks at large paleontological patterns, is presented in a recent issue of the American Biology Teacher (April, 1999) by Anton Lawson (see reference below). The focus is more on critical thinking, forming testable hypotheses to challenge three "theories" about the origin of the diversity of life: spontaneous generation, special creation, and evolution. Many of the hypotheses can be tested simply by studying a sampling of fossils representative of the geological column, figuratively "gathered on a field trip into the Grand Canyon". Types and inexpensive sources of fossils you could use for this activity are presented in a companion article in the same issue of the ABT by James Platt (see reference).The author presents the activity using a "hypothetico-deductive type of learning cycle approach. It comes very close to being an activity which uses the "fair-test" approach outlined by Craig Nelson, of the ENSI faculty. A sample handout for students, along with tips and strategies for the teacher are clearly presented. Looks like a winner. If you try this activity, please give us your feedback. |
| CONCEPTS | PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: 1. Enable students to discover evidence that generally supports evolution theory and fails to support the alternative explanations of special creation and spontaneous generation. 2. Improve students' understanding of the nature of science and improve their critical thinking skills. |
| MATERIALS | None Noted |
| STUDENT HANDOUTS | None Noted |
| TEACHING STRATEGY | REFERENCES: Lawson, Anton E. "A Scientific Approach to Teaching About Evolution & Special Creation". The American Biology Teacher, vol.61, no.4, April 1999, pages 266-274). Platt, James E. "Putting Together Fossil Collections for 'Hands-On' Evolution Laboratories". The American Biology Teacher, vol.61, no.4, April 1999, pages 275-281). |
| ATTRIBUTION | See References Above (Some of the ideas in this lesson may have been adapted from earlier, unacknowledged sources without our knowledge. If the reader believes this to be the case, please let us know, and appropriate corrections will be made. Thanks.) |
A Mini-Lesson
Natural Selection....
a Cumulative Process...
it's in the cards!
or
Natural Selection Among Playing Cards
by Werner G. Heim Adapted from an article in
The American Biology Teacher, April 2002
| SYNOPSIS | A common criticism of natural selection is "how can it produce novel complex useful structures by pure random chance?" Darwin's answer to this "difficulty", (which he actually raised himself), was that selection is NOT a random process, and furthermore, it is cumulative, which he ably explained. Unfortunately, these facts are seldom included in typical classwork on evolution. It should be a required part for every presentation of natural selection. This lesson provides an elegant, easy way for students to actually compare Darwin's cumulative non-random selection with the non-cumulative version so often erroneously implied. Students working in pairs attempt to produce a full sequence of 13 cards of one suit (ace - to king). This must be done by shuffling the suit of cards for each round, then checking the cards. Half the teams must look for the full sequence each time, and repeat the process until this is accomplished. The other teams start to "build" their sequence by pulling the ace when it first appears as the top card, then adding to the stack whenever the "next" card for the sequence is shuffled to the top. Discussion clearly reveals how the second method mimics Darwinian natural selection, while the first does not. |
| CONCEPTS | Natural selection is a non-random process. Evolution by natural selection is a cumulative process. Cumulative selection can produce novel useful complex structures in relatively short periods of time. |
MATERIALS: Acceptable (for teams of 4): 1 deck of cards for every 16 students (2 decks per class of 32) scratch paper a. Simply as "an interesting game" ...to be discussed as to its significance afterwards. 6. Point out that Odd-Numbered teams will follow procedure A, and Even-Numbered teams must do procedure B. When a team achieves the goal (full sequence ace-to-king), the recorder reports the number of rounds taken to do it. One of the players thoroughly shuffles the cards, returns them to the envelope, and hands it in to the teacher. That team goes to work on the questions, preparing for class discussion. |
| ATTRIBUTION (Some of the ideas in this lesson may have been adapted from earlier, unacknowledged sources without our knowledge. If the reader believes this to be the case, please let us know, and appropriate corrections will be made. Thanks.) | Original article: "Natural Selection Among Playing Cards" by Werner G. Heim, in the April 2002 issue of The American Biology Teacher, vol. 64, no. 4, pages 276-278. Dr. Heim is Professor Emeritus of Biology, Department of Biology, The Colorado College, 14 East Cache La Poudre, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80903-3294; E-mail: wheim@coloradocollege.edu Lesson adapted for ENSIweb lesson by Larry Flammer, September 2002, with kind permission of NABT and the author. Some updating and correcting: 6 April 2007. |
The following is a useful handout for students to use for this lesson
BACKGROUND: When studying natural selection, the question often arises "how can pure chance create new complex structures or processes, much less new species?" Implied here is that natural selection is a process of pure chance, which is a common misconception; selection is not a matter of chance. Furthermore, natural selection does not say that all parts of a complex system must come together all at once. Natural selection is a stepwise constructive process which selectively builds new functional complex systems piece by piece, often just modifying previous systems to perform new functions. This truly creative ability of natural selection is often unappreciated or even misunderstood. The purpose of this lesson is for you to experience the effectiveness of cumulative natural selection, both in its creative potential, and in its increased efficiency, as reflected in how it increases the probability of complex systems to form. FOR THE "B" TEAM, Even-numbered sets: |
Name_________________________________ Date____________ Per.____
CUMULATIVE NATURAL SELECTION DISCUSSION
When you have achieved the target sequence (or when your teacher says to stop trying), return the cards to their envelope, and work on answering the following questions. Be prepared to participate in class discussion of these questions.
1. In what ways is shuffling the equivalent of genetic mutations?
In what ways is it not?
Does the model (card "game") distinguish between phenotype and genotype?
2. What is the one, critical respect in which the actions of the odd- and even-numbered teams differed?
What is the biological equivalent of this difference?
3. What, in the game, represented selection?
4. Why, in the game, was selection cumulative?
5. What was the average number of observed generations needed to evolve the organism by the even-numbered teams?
How does this figure compare to the calculated average number of generations? (Hint: On the average, in each round, the ace has a 1:13 chance of coming up, the "2" has a 1:12 chance, etc. The sum of the numbers from 1 to 13 is 91)
6. What was the average number of observed generations needed to evolve the organism by the odd-numbered teams?
Do we have the data to answer this question?
What would be the calculated number of generations? (Hint: We need to have the ace show up first, with a probability of 1/13, then the "2," with a probability of 1/12 ... to the king with a probability of 1/1. 1/13 X 1/12 X 1/11 ... 1/1 is approximately 1.6X10^-10. 1/1.6X10^-10 is about 6.2X10^9. Shortcut: 13! = 6,227,020,800.)
7. How many times faster is the evolution of our model organism with versus without cumulative selection among the mutations?
8. What new understanding has this lesson taught you?









